CSU Northridge Role of Human Factors in Buncefield Explosion Discussion **Kindly read the attached file carefully and follow all its instructions**Please c

CSU Northridge Role of Human Factors in Buncefield Explosion Discussion **Kindly read the attached file carefully and follow all its instructions**Please choose any incident which reflect the Human Factors in consequences that happened before.Introduction- general introduction on human factors about the incident Role of Human Factors consequences -identify and explain the specific dimensions and features that influence the accidentFailures/errors- Classify specific human failures types and explain the failure/error with relevance to the accident Study Conclusion References **Kindly read the attached file carefully and follow all its instructions** ASSESSMENT BRIEF 2019-2020
Programme:
Module Code/Module Title:
B.Sc. (Hons) Health, Safety and Environmental
Management
OM3071 Human Factors in Health & Safety
Module Tutor:
Dr .P.S.Raju/Salim
Assessment Title/ Number:
Report
Date of Issue:
Date of Submission:
———
23/02/2020
16/04/2020
(Tick in the appropriate box)
You are encouraged to word process your assessment, although hand written work
is acceptable.
√
You are required to word process this assessment.
You are required to submit this assessment electronically through WebCT
Instructions:
•
This assessment contains 1 tasks.
•
This assessment is worth 50% of the module mark.
Please do not submit this assessment brief with your work.
Page 1 of 6
TASK 1
In this task you are expected to visit any industry of your choice and conduct an incident
investigation. Based on your observation, you are to prepare a detailed Health and safety
Report. The report should consist of approximately 1500 words.
The Report Should Focus on identifying the role of human factors in the occurrence and
consequence of the chosen accident. It should contain a brief introduction describing the
background information of the case, identifying the specific pre-accident strategy and explain
the features involved in each strategy with relevance to the case study, recommend postaccident (reactive) strategies fitting intended for the case, conclusion and supported
references.
You are required to refer from wide range of literature review materials and sources to write
this report. Please refer to the Guidelines for preparing the report.
The report should be preferably submitted in the following format:
1. Introduction- general introduction on human factors about the incident
2. Role of Human Factors consequences -identify and explain the specific dimensions and
features that influence the accident
3. Failures/errors- Classify specific human failures types and explain the failure/error with
relevance to the accident Study
4. Conclusion
5. References
.
Guidelines
1
You are encouraged to complete and submit the work even before the deadline if
possible.
2 Do not forget to reference your work properly; otherwise you will put yourself at the risk
of “PLAGIARISM”
3 Use preferably Microsoft Word for word processing
Page 2 of 6
4 Page setup Use A4 paper size settings and use 2.5cm margins all around, Leave the
Gutter at 0cm.
5 Body text body text is Arial 12 point, single-spaced with no paragraph spacing attached
before or after. Text is justified. Leave one blank line between paragraphs.
6 The pages should be numbered consecutively, starting with the text page (abstract
page/section) excluding title page, index/content page.
7 Section heading is Arial 12 point, bold, upper case (capitalize). Start each section
heading or category in a New/Fresh Page.
8 The project thesis should contain an index page or contents page.
9 All symbols and abbreviations must be defined, and used only when absolutely
necessary.
10 The number of words must be shown at the end of the work submitted. The title page,
acknowledgements page and contents page will not count; neither will the list of
reference at the end of the work. Footnotes will be counted; in any case their use is
discouraged. If your work requires a larger proportion of non-verbal forms of
presentation, it can be agreed with the module tutor how these will be calculated.
11 Referencing
Referencing is a system that allows you to acknowledge the contributions of others in
your writing. Whenever you use ANY words, ideas or information from ANY source in
your assignments, you must reference those sources. This means that if you use the
exact words of an author, if you paraphrase their words or if you summarise their ideas,
you must provide a reference. Not referencing your sources means you may be charged
with plagiarism and your work could be failed. For citation and referencing follow the
Harvard referencing system strictly.
Marking Criteria
The coursework will be assessed and graded on the overall report submitted. The coursework
weightage is indicative to knowledge, understanding and application of knowledge. The
report should demonstrate understanding including the theoretical analysis and synthesis,
critical analysis of the document, evaluation and conclusion, citation/referencing/supporting
evidence/ originality and sources and presentation of the overall piece of work.
Page 3 of 6
LEVEL SIX
FIRST
(80-100%)
FIRST
(70-79%)
UPPER SECOND
(60-69%)
LOWER SECOND
(50-59%)
THIRD
Written work is directly relevant to the title. Knowledge and
understanding is comprehensive in both breadth and depth. Student
demonstrates an exceptional ability to contextualise, to critically
appreciate concepts and their inter-relationship, and/or to relate theory
with evidence. Exceptional ability to apply, in the right measure, the
skills necessary to achieve a desired outcome. Evidence of very
extensive, if not exhaustive reading and study beyond the course
content. Clear evidence of independent thought. The presentation is
highly sophisticated, fluent and accurate and in an appropriate format.
The material is presented in a focused way, so as to help sustain the
argument. Citation and referencing are impeccable. The work may be as
good, if not better, than you imagine a professional tutor could write,
and is possibly of publishable quality.
Written work is directly relevant to the title. Knowledge and
understanding is comprehensive in both breadth and depth. Student
demonstrates a clear ability to contextualise, to critically appreciate
concepts and their inter-relationship, and/or to relate theory with
evidence. Outstanding ability to apply, in the right measure, the skills
necessary to achieve a desired outcome. Evidence of extensive reading
and study beyond the course content. Clear evidence of independent
thought. The presentation is highly sophisticated, fluent and accurate
and in an appropriate format. The material is presented in a focused
way, so as to help sustain the argument. Citation and referencing are
impeccable.
Written work is directly relevant to the title. The knowledge-base is upto-date and relevant, but may also be broad or deep. Work reflects a
thorough grasp of concepts and of the inter-relationship, and a
significant ability to relate theory to practice. The presentation is very
good and in an appropriate format, the material generally well-focused,
reflecting a high degree of literacy. Arguments may sometimes be
outstanding and reflective of genuine independent thought, but are not
always consistently at that level. Material is very well presented and
citation and referencing are very good.
Written work is directly relevant to the title. Arguments may be
generally relevant but not necessarily comprehensive. The student
displays an awareness of what concepts are, but the ability to
conceptualise, and/or to relate theory to evidence, is clearly limited.
Frequent use of assertion rather than argument. Grammar and spelling
sound, but perhaps with occasional lapses. Material is well presented
and in an appropriate format. Citation and referencing are generally
good but may contain some errors.
Written work is predominantly relevant to the title. Knowledge is
adequate but limited and/or superficial, with a tendency to inaccuracy.
Page 4 of 6
LEVEL SIX
(40-49%)
COMPENSATABLE
FAIL
(35-39%)
Limited awareness of concepts. Limited ability to contextualise, and to
relate theory to evidence. Frequently, evidence (which may be accurate)
is deployed superficially with lack of focus. Almost always offers
description/assertion rather than argument. Grammar may be poor, or
the linkage between paragraphs may be weak. Competent presentation
and an acceptable format, although deficiencies are clearly evident.
Citation and referencing are present but may contain quite a few errors.
At least 45% of material presented is relevant but there may be limited
reference to the question. A generally poor but compensatable answer
with extensive errors and omissions, or a substantial answer on the
general topic in which the specific, central question is misinterpreted or
avoided, or a very good essay in note form. Presentation is poor and
sometimes inarticulate. Little evidence of appropriate reading but
citation and referencing must be present, although there may be a
substantial number of errors. (Note – absence of citation and referencing
at Level 3 must be regarded as a clear failure and must be awarded

Purchase answer to see full
attachment