Have you ever gone online to search for a journal article on a specific topic? It is amazing to see the large number of journals that are available in the health care field. When you view the library in its entirety, you are viewing untapped data. Until you actually research for your particular topic, there is little structure. Once you have narrowed it down, you have information and once you apply the information, you have knowledge. Eventually, after thoughtful research and diligent practice, you reach the level of wisdomknowledge applied in meaningful ways.
Are there areas in your practice that you believe should be more fully explored? The central aims of nursing bioinformatics are to manage and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. This continuum represents the overarching structure of nursing bioinformatics. In this Assignment, you develop a research question relevant to your practice area and relate how you would work through the progression from data to information, knowledge, and wisdom.
To prepare:
Write a 3- to 4-page paper that aIDresses the following:
Your paper must also include a title page, an introduction, a summary, and a reference page.
Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers
| Levels of Achievement | |||||
| Criteria | Outstanding Performance | Excellent Performance | Competent Performance | Proficient Performance | Room for Improvement |
| QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking (0-30 Points) |
30 to 30 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are aIDressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics |
25 to 29 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are aIDressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics |
20 to 24 points
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are aIDressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. |
16 to 19 points
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not aIDressed or inadequately aIDressed. |
0 to 15 points
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not aIDressed or inadequately aIDressed. |
| QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear (0-5 Points) | 5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
4 to 4 points
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
1 to 3 points
Purpose of the assignment is vague. |
0 to 0 points
No purpose statement was provided. |
| ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS
The extent to which the work reflects the students ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the assignments key concepts (0-10 Points) |
10 to 10 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. |
9 to 9 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. |
8 to 8 points
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. |
5 to 7 points
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. |
0 to 4 points
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. |
| ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources (0-20 Points) | 20 to 20 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in aIDition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view. |
15 to 19 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in aIDition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view. |
10 to 14 points
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3 to 4 course resources to support major points and point of view. |
3 to 9 points
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. |
0 to 2 points
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view. |
| ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 3. Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. (0-20 Points) | 20 to 20 points
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. |
18 to 19 points
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. |
16 to 17 points
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. |
14 to 15 points
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. |
0 to 13 points
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. |
| WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 1. Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focusedneither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. (0-5 Points) | 5 to 5 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards. |
5 to 5 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards. |
4 to 4 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 80% of the time. |
3 to 3 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 70% of the time. |
0 to 2 points
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards < 70% of the time. |
| WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 2. English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation (0-5 Points) | 5 to 5 points
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
5 to 5 points
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 to 4 points
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 to 3 points
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 |
0 to 2 points
Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding. |
| WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 3. The paper follows correct SPA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list (0-5 Points) | 5 to 5 points
Uses correct SPA format with no errors. |
5 to 5 points
Uses correct SPA format with no errors. |
4 to 4 points
Contains a few (1-2) SPA format errors. |
3 to 3 points
Contains several (3-4) SPA format errors. |
0 to 2 points
Contains many (? 5) SPA format errors. |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
