NR 599 Chamberlain College of Nursing W7 Post TANIC Worksheet Purpose The self-assessment is completed using the TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informa

NR 599 Chamberlain College of Nursing W7 Post TANIC Worksheet Purpose

The self-assessment is completed using the TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC) tool. TIGER refers to the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform Initiative which identified a list of the minimum informatics competencies for all nurses and students graduating from pre- and post-licensure programs. The graded self-evaluation of your informatics competencies is required in order to increase one’s own u nderstanding of competencies in nursing informatics which will enable the planning of strategies to enhance knowledge and skills.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Apply knowledge of nursing informatics and non-nursing science (CO 1 and 2)
Assess nursing informatics competencies (CO2)
Evaluate progress in enhancing nursing informatics competencies (CO4)
Foster professional and personal development with planning strategies to enhance these competencies (CO4)
Examine ethical decision making in relation to these competencies (CO3)

Due Date:

This assignment is due no later than the Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7.

Total Points Possible: 75

Requirements:

In order to prepare for this assignment, read the lessons as well as the assigned readings BEFORE attempting the self-assessment.
Please use the following hyperlink to access and complete the survey: Week 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment Survey (Links to an external site.)
FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY WILL RESULT IN A GRADE OF ZERO (0) FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.
After completing the survey, navigate to the Week 7 Module in Canvas and respond to EACH of the questions for your Reflection Post .
The Reflection Posts DOES NOT require cross-posting to a peer or faculty .
Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Reflection Questions:

Reflect and respond to EACH of the following questions.

Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?
Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?
As discussed in the lesson this week, healthcare providers must be competent in informatics in order to make ethical decisions about informatics technologies and patients’ intimate healthcare data and information. To the extent that information technology is reshaping healthcare practices or promises to improve patient care, healthcare professionals must possess certain competencies which will assist with consistency and quality. Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain. Purpose
The self-assessment is completed using the TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informatics
Competencies (TANIC) tool. TIGER refers to the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform
Initiative which identified a list of the minimum informatics competencies for all nurses and students
graduating from pre- and post-licensure programs. The graded self-evaluation of your informatics
competencies is required in order to increase one’s own u nderstanding of competencies in nursing
informatics which will enable the planning of strategies to enhance knowledge and skills.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
1. Apply knowledge of nursing informatics and non-nursing science (CO 1 and 2)
2. Assess nursing informatics competencies (CO2)
3. Evaluate progress in enhancing nursing informatics competencies (CO4)
4. Foster professional and personal development with planning strategies to enhance these
competencies (CO4)
5. Examine ethical decision making in relation to these competencies (CO3)
Due Date:
This assignment is due no later than the Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7.
Total Points Possible: 75
Requirements:
1. In order to prepare for this assignment, read the lessons as well as the assigned readings
BEFORE attempting the self-assessment.
2. Please use the following hyperlink to access and complete the survey: Week 7 Post-TANIC SelfAssessment Survey (Links to an external site.)
3. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY WILL RESULT IN A GRADE OF ZERO (0) FOR THE
ASSIGNMENT.
4. After completing the survey, navigate to the Week 7 Module in Canvas and respond to EACH of
the questions for your Reflection Post .
5. The Reflection Posts DOES NOT require cross-posting to a peer or faculty .
6. Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this
course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a
professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside
scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources
such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often
ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a
peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search
one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should
not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone
can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For
example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the
responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your
instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the
site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be
published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment
is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
Reflection Questions:
Reflect and respond to EACH of the following questions.
1. Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level
compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?
2. Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?
3. As discussed in the lesson this week, healthcare providers must be competent in informatics in
order to make ethical decisions about informatics technologies and patients’ intimate
healthcare data and information. To the extent that information technology is reshaping
healthcare practices or promises to improve patient care, healthcare professionals must possess
certain competencies which will assist with consistency and quality. Which two competencies
did you achieve in this course? Explain.
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category
Application of
Course
Knowledge
Scholarliness
and Scholarly
Resources
Points %
40
20
53
27
Description
This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability
to: Compare their competency results to that of the ir Week
2 assessment; identify competencies that may be useful as an APN
and why ; discuss how information technology is
reshaping healthcare ; and explain which competencies were
achieved in this course.
This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability
to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources ; p rovide
relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the
evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions;
evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis
or synthesis ; use s ources published within the last 5 years; match
reference list and in-text citations match , and minimize or
appropriately format direct quotations.
60
Total CONTENT Points=60 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category
Points %
Grammar,
Spelling, Syntax,
15
Mechanics and
APA Format
Description
Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling,
syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is
limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the
post.
20
* APA style references and in text citations are required; however,
there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of
references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be
included.
**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add
substantively to the discussion
Total FORMAT Points= 15pts
75
100% ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 75pts

Purchase answer to see full
attachment