NRS 433V Grand Canyon University Importance of Nursing Education Reflection Paper The IOM published report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing H

NRS 433V Grand Canyon University Importance of Nursing Education Reflection Paper The IOM published report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” makes recommendations for lifelong learning and achieving higher levels of education.

In 1,000-1,250 words, examine the importance of nursing education and discuss your overall educational goals.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRS 433V Grand Canyon University Importance of Nursing Education Reflection Paper The IOM published report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing H
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Include the following:

Discuss your options in the job market based on your educational level.
Review the IOM Future of Nursing Recommendations for achieving higher levels of education. Describe what professional certification and advanced degrees (MSN, DNP, etc.) you want to pursue and explain your reasons for wanting to attain the education. Discuss your timeline for accomplishing these goals.
Discuss how increasing your level of education would affect how your competitiveness in the current job market and your role in the future of nursing.
Discuss the relationship of continuing nursing education to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics.
Discuss whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory. Provide support for your response.

You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Running head: ASSIGNMENT TITLE HERE
Typing Template for APA Papers: A Sample of Proper Formatting for the APA 6th Edition
Student A. Sample
Grand Canyon University:
1
ASSIGNMENT TITLE HERE
2
Typing Template for APA Papers: A Sample of Proper Formatting for the APA 6th Edition
This is an electronic template for papers written in APA style (American Psychological
Association, 2010). The purpose of the template is to help the student set the margins and
spacing. Margins are set at 1 inch for top, bottom, left, and right. The type is left-justified only—
that means the left margin is straight, but the right margin is ragged. Each paragraph is indented
five spaces. It is best to use the tab key to indent. The line spacing is double throughout the
paper, even on the reference page. One space is used after punctuation at the end of sentences.
The font style used in this template is Times New Roman and the font size is 12.
First Heading
The heading above would be used if you want to have your paper divided into sections
based on content. This is the first level of heading, and it is centered and bolded with each word
of four letters or more capitalized. The heading should be a short descriptor of the section. Note
that not all papers will have headings or subheadings in them.
First Subheading
The subheading above would be used if there are several sections within the topic labeled
in a heading. The subheading is flush left and bolded, with each word of four letters or more
capitalized.
Second Subheading
APA dictates that you should avoid having only one subsection heading and subsection
within a section. In other words, use at least two subheadings under a main heading, or do not
use any at all.
When you are ready to write, and after having read these instructions completely, you can
delete these directions and start typing. The formatting should stay the same. However, one item
ASSIGNMENT TITLE HERE
3
that you will have to change is the page header, which is placed at the top of each page along
with the page number. The words included in the page header should be reflective of the title of
your paper, so that if the pages are intermixed with other papers they will be identifiable. When
using Word 2003, double click on the words in the page header. This should enable you to edit
the words. You should not have to edit the page numbers.
In addition to spacing, APA style includes a special way of citing resource articles. See
the APA manual for specifics regarding in-text citations. The APA manual also discusses the
desired tone of writing, grammar, punctuation, formatting for numbers, and a variety of other
important topics. Although the APA style rules are used in this template, the purpose of the
template is only to demonstrate spacing and the general parts of the paper. The student will need
to refer to the APA manual for other format directions. GCU has prepared an APA Style Guide
available in the Student Writing Center for additional help in correctly formatting according to
APA style.
The reference list should appear at the end of a paper (see the next page). It provides the
information necessary for a reader to locate and retrieve any source you cite in the body of the
paper. Each source you cite in the paper must appear in your reference list; likewise, each entry
in the reference list must be cited in your text. A sample reference page is included below; this
page includes examples of how to format different reference types (e.g., books, journal articles,
information from a website). The examples on the following page include examples taken
directly from the APA manual.
ASSIGNMENT TITLE HERE
4
References
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological
Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Daresh, J. C. (2004). Beginning the assistant principalship: A practical guide for new school
administrators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Herbst-Damm, K. L., & Kulik, J. A. (2005). Volunteer support, marital status, and the survival
times of terminally ill patients. Health Psychology, 24, 225-229. doi:10.1037/02786133.24.2.225
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute. (2003). Managing asthma: A guide for schools (NIH
Publication No. 02-2650). Retrieved from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/
health/prof/asthma/asth_sch.pdf
Course Code
NRS-433V
Class Code
NRS-433V-OL191
Criteria
Content
Percentage
75.0%
Quantitative Studies
5.0%
Background of Study
10.0%
Article Support of Nursing Practice
15.0%
Method of Study
15.0%
Results of Study
15.0%
Anticipated Outcomes and Outcomes
Comparison
15.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles
presented use quantitative research.
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
incomplete.
Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is
incomplete.
Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted.
The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications
for nursing practice, is incomplete.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are omitted or are
unrealistic. Comparison of research article outcomes to
anticipated outcomes is incomplete.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
200.0
2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)
Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only
one article is based on quantitative research.
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is
presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to
answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information
and detail is required.
A partial summary of the method of study for each article is
presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete.
A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or
incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
A summary of the study results includes findings and
implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and
explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are partially summarized.
Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated
outcomes contains omissions of key information. It is unclear
how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the
current research mentioned compare.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, or word choice are present.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
3: Satisfactory (83.00%)
N/A
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
partially complete and includes some relevant details and
explanation.
A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT
question is presented. The articles demonstrate general
support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is
unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the
articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question.
Some rational or information is needed.
A general discussion on the method of study for each article
is presented. The comparison of study methods is
summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are
summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions.
More information is needed.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications
for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the
discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are summarized.
Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated
outcomes is generally presented. More information is needed
to fully establish how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT
and those of the current research mentioned compare.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
4: Good (94.00%)
N/A
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is
presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the
proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison
groups in the articles compare to those identified in the
PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity
or support.
A discussion on the method of study for each article is
presented. The comparison of study methods is generally
described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are
presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is
required for accuracy or clarity.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications
for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details
and explanation.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are discussed. A
comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated
outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how
the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the
current research mentioned compare is presented. Some
detail is needed for clarity.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
: Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on
quantitative research.
Background of study, including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is
thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive
explanation.
A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question
is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in
answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions
Relate this directly back to the PICOT
and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to
intervention. It might be a good idea to
those identified in the PICOT question.
repeat the questions in this section.
A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article
is presented. The comparison of study methods is described
in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are
Give more details about the method,
presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid
sample size, where the study took place,
understanding of research methods.
the logistics.
Discussion of study results, including findings and implications
for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant
details and extensive explanation.
Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are thoroughly
discussed. A detailed comparison of research article
outcomes to the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is
presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes
of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned
compare is presented in detail.
What you have is good but, you also need
to discuss the numbers and statistical
information.
You need to discuss and directly relate the
anticipated outcomes of the PICOT
question to the outcomes of the research,
are they the same, how do they differ,
etc?
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
You do not have an introduction. In the
intro you need to outline what the paper
will be about, discuss the theses, and the
purpose for writing the paper.
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
There is no conclusion.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
A few typos or mechanical errors
All format elements are correct.
You need to include more headings. Use
methods, results, ethical considerations,
etc, headings. There is no running head or
page numbers Double space
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Double space and use hanging indents.
Points Earned
10.00/10.00
20.00/20.00
24.90/30.00
24.90/30.00
24.90/30.00
24.90/30.00
7.50/10.00
8.30/10.00
9.40/10.00
7.50/10.00
9.40/10.00
171.70/200.0

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.