The Ethics of Mandated Treatment
Attached is the scenarios and I chose numbers 1 and 2. Two pages in length and APA format. As well is attached 4 articles to help out with and remember to quote the APA ethical code of conduct.
Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week. The use of mandated, or legally coerced, treatment is widespread. Yet research demonstrating the efficacy of this type of treatment is limited, and mandating mental health treatment is one of the most contested issues in the field of psychology. To justify the continued use of mandated treatment, policymakers, practitioners, and researchers are obligated to demonstrate the effectiveness and limitations of such treatment programs.
You have been called in to consult on cases that may require mandated treatment. After reviewing the scearnios chose two to discuss in your initial post. Begin your research with the required resources for this week. Using the specific situations presented in each of the scenarios you have chosen, conduct further research to help inform your recommendations for each individual. A minimum of one resource per scenario, beyond those already required for the assignment, must be included in your initial post.
In your post, construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to present your recommendations as to whether or not treatment should be mandated for the individuals in each of the scenarios. As you write your recommendations, be certain to provide insights into the following questions.
Integrating concepts from your research and the required readings, offer insights across different content domains as to why you have reached these conclusions. Explain how you used the APA Ethical Code of Conduct to guide your decisions. Evaluate the generalizability of your specific research findings to the situations presented and provide a rationale as to why this research supports your recommendations.
Denying autonomy in order to create it: the paradox of forcing treatment upon addicts. (2008). Addiction, 103(12), 19191921. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02369.x
Manchak, S. M., Skeem, J. L., & Rook, K. S. (2014). Care, control, or both? Characterizing major dimensions of the mandated treatment relationship. Law and Human Behavior, 38(1), 4757. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1037/lhb0000039
Snyder, C. M. J., & Anderson, S. A. (2009). AN EXAMINATION OF MANDATED VERSUS VOLUNTARY REFERRAL AS A DETERMINANT OF CLINICAL OUTCOME. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(3), 278-92. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00118.x
Sullivan, M. A., Birkmayer, F., Boyarsky, B. K., Frances, R. J., Fromson, J. A., Galanter, M., Westermeyer, J. (2008). Uses of Coercion in Addiction Treatment: Clinical Aspects. American Journal on Addictions, 17(1), 3647. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1080/10550490701756369
Walker, R., Cole, J., & Logan, T. K. (2008). Identifying Client-Level Indicators of Recovery Among DUI, Criminal Justice, and Non-Criminal Justice Treatment Referrals. Substance Use & Misuse, 43(12/13), 17851801. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1080/10826080802297484
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.